🔗 Share this article

A decade following the UK stumbled into a rushed public vote that divided the nation and caused turmoil, a advisory comes from beyond the Irish Sea: it may occur once more.

Authorities and citizens sleepwalked into Brexit and the identical could occur with a national vote on a unified Ireland, sparking disturbances for which no one is equipped.

That is the message from two respected commentators from each side of the Irish border who have collaborated to scrutinise the benefits and drawbacks of Northern Ireland leaving the UK to create a new state with the Republic of Ireland.

Governmental Establishments Unprepared

The author and columnist and Sam McBride, have determined that the political establishments in Ireland and Britain are extremely ill-prepared for a possibly fraught and transformative public vote.

"The key takeaway of Brexit remains unheeded, which is that developments can emerge unexpectedly and can build support very quickly," the commentator remarked. "In my opinion that the institutional structure of our islands remains highly fragile."

New Title Intends to Encourage Dialogue

The pair have studied the political, economic and societal rationales for any governmental shift in a publication, Examining Irish Unification, issued by the Dublin-based Royal Irish Academy.

They aim to provoke discussion on the issue with a tour of public talks that will take them to Westminster early next month.

"What haunts everyone, or ought to concern all involved, is the Brexit referendum of 2016," stated O’Toole.

"We should prevent a national vote on a yes-no, ambiguous question whose consequences have not been spelled out because then you find yourself with an highly polarised community where the losing side are resistant to defeat and the people who have won lack clarity exactly what it is that they have achieved."

Constitutional Provision

Under the Belfast Agreement, the Northern Ireland secretary of state is obliged to schedule a referendum on Irish unity if it seems probable that a most voters would approve.

Nationalist parties and other nationalists argue that moment is looming, and a group named Ireland’s Future has built momentum, but both governments and pro-UK factions downplay the possibility, leaving it unclear whether or when there might be a national vote.

Lack of Substantive Discussion

Political rhetoric for and against unification has hidden the absence of substantive discussion, noted McBride.

"Individuals are often for or against the concept but the actual thinking which could extend past that to realise it is mostly absent. Much has gone on in academia but scarcely any politicians or activists want to engage even with the fundamentals. For instance, what type of nation would you want? Unitary? Decentralised?"

Book's Approach

In the book, no writer advocates unity or the status quo. Each composes two essays that aim for objectivity in presenting the argument for a unified Ireland and the case against, assembling financial and societal figures, past examples and governmental frameworks.

Arguments cover national emblems, levies, health services, elderly benefits, public liabilities and the threat of pro-UK militancy. The aim is to enlighten and encourage conversation.

"There is significant curiosity in the subject but there hasn't quite been a debate," stated the writer. "Debate indicates an recognition of the concept that there might be good arguments on either side."

Dual Referendums

A public vote in Northern Ireland would also trigger one in the republic, where citizens claim they support unification but refuse paying higher taxes or introducing a different emblem to acknowledge unionists' British culture.

"Authorities in Dublin must determine what the offer from nationalist groups is aside from just saying: 'We seek a united Ireland and we love you'," said O’Toole.

Possibility of Referendum

McBride believes a national vote in his lifetime is probable and that it could happen unexpectedly. "You could have just a mad or a ill-advised or a feckless government minister who states: 'We should proceed and settle the matter.'"

Both pro-unification advocates and pro-UK supporters have plausible, justified points, he commented. "One side will succeed in this matter and the other side will in the end not succeed but both parties has has valuable insights to gain from the other's viewpoints."

Request for Wider Discussion

Westminster needed to participate in the debate, stated O’Toole. "This involves the United Kingdom. It is a British question just as much as it is an Irish matter."